Proposed Hybrid Intelligent Model Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Decision Trees for Early Detection of Learning Disabilities: Design and Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajmtcs.v7i4.984Keywords:
Learning Disabilities, Early Detection, Risk Classification, Hybrid Model, Artificial Neural NetworksAbstract
Early identification of learning difficulties is an important challenge in education because timely screening can support appropriate educational intervention. Machine-learning methods can process multidimensional information, but individual approaches involve trade-offs between predictive performance and interpretability. This study proposes a sequential hybrid model that combines a C4.5 decision tree with a multilayer perceptron (MLP). In the first stage, the decision tree identifies informative features and generates human-readable IF–THEN rules; in the second stage, the selected features are provided to an MLP for three-class classification. The model was evaluated on a synthetic dataset of 1,200 children aged 5–7 years, containing 18 simulated demographic, cognitive, linguistic/academic, and behavioral features and three target classes: Typical, At-Risk Dyslexia, and At-Risk Dyscalculia. The hybrid model achieved 96.8% accuracy and a macro F1-score of 0.97 on the reported evaluation set, compared with 94.2% and 0.94 for the standalone MLP and 88.6% and 0.88 for the standalone decision tree. Because the experiments used synthetic data exclusively, these findings constitute a methodological proof of concept rather than evidence of clinical or educational diagnostic validity. Validation using independently collected real-world datasets is required before practical deployment.
References
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
H. W. Catts, M. E. Fey, X. Zhang, and J. B. Tomblin, “Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation,” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 38–50, 2001.
J. M. Fletcher, G. R. Lyon, L. S. Fuchs, and M. A. Barnes, Learning Disabilities: From Identification to Intervention, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press, 2019.
S. B. Kotsiantis, I. D. Zaharakis, and P. E. Pintelas, “Machine learning: A review of classification and combining techniques,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 159–190, 2006.
J. R. Quinlan, C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Mateo, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
Z. C. Lipton, “The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery,” Queue, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 31–57, 2018.
I. Ismoilov, “Iskandar oynasi,” Oltin bitiglar–Golden Scripts, vol. 4, no. 4, 2019.
I. Ismoilov, “The image of ‘The Mirror of Iskandar’ in the poetry of Alisher Navai and its comparative analysis.”
I. Ismoilov, “‘Boburnoma’ as a literary source,” American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Research, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 128–130, 2025, doi: 10.37547/ajsshr/Volume05Issue11-32.
B. Tukhliev and I. Ismailov, “The image of Iskandar in Turkic sources,” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1195–1200, 2020.
I. Ismoilov, “About the talismans of Iskandar (Alexander) by Alisher Navoi,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 139–145, 2021, doi: 10.21744/ijllc.v7n3.1488.
I. Ismoilov, “Nizomiy va Navoiy: bir mavzuning turfa talqini,” O‘zbekiston: til va madaniyat. Adabiyotshunoslik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2023.
I. Ismoilov, “Alisher Navoiyning ‘Saddi Iskandariy’ dostoni debochasi badiiyati,” Oltin bitiglar–Golden Scripts, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021.
I. Ismoilov, “Tafsirlarda Iskandar mavzusiga oid talqinlar,” Oltin bitiglar–Golden Scripts, vol. 2, no. 2,2021
